Latinos and other races Essay

Researchers did a battlefield on bicycle helmet go for in a country-bred Georgia town. They find children travel bicycles during specified days and times all in all over a five month period, both(prenominal) before and after incentive programs bid loosen helmet distri providedion and motor motorcycle pr unconstipatedtative cultivation. Another incentive was that kids bicycles would be impounded if they were be riding without a helmet. Researchers canvassed the towns on Friday afternoons and about of the day Saturday, as these were determined to be the most popular riding times.They observed the riders indirectly and cited the childs sequence, gender, race, and helmet habituate. Data was collected for children who were surrounded by the ages of 5 and 13, which argon the ages that the helmet law covered. The investigateers found that these mea accepteds increase helmet affair from 0% to about 45%. Sampling for this study was somewhat difficult. Beca workout the re searchers were using only note, and they did not racetrack both individual riders or interact with them in any sort, they were unable to guarantee that the riders were in truth of the targeted age.This is especially true of older kids, between the ages of 10 and 13, as these kids put up passing varying sizes and presence or absence seizure of secantary sexual characteristics, which were two of the find factors in determining the childs age. Sampling the older congregation was in addition difficult because not ein truthone in this age convocation actually received a helmet, since they went to a big school that include children from another town. The results for this age convention, indeed, ar believably skewed and possibly not very valid.The towns racial take a crap up, too, was heavily slanted towards black children, with 75% black and 25% livid children. ascribable to cultural differences between black and white children, researchers may need to repeat these st udies in communities where racial make up is more(prenominal) heavily white, and communities which include Asians, Latinos, and other races. all(prenominal) culture is individual and severally would promising have a antithetical reaction to the helmet laws and constabulary enforcement. Within this familiarity, the researchers probably should have used only the 5 10 geezerhood age group, as this group could be more carefully controlled.Researchers were informed that this age group, which attended elementary school, did all receive slack helmets and bicycle education. They in addition would possibly have an easier time sight age, as size is more asserting(a) in younger children rather than in older children. This study was somewhat valid. The researchers coincide that they were unable to track individual riders, so when they had four observers canvassing the town at erstwhile, it was possible that certain riders may have been recorded several times (a first tread t hat the researchers themselves are aware of, merely are not concerned with).Noting, as they said, rides quite of riders also is a limitation, although the researchers felt that their mode of observation led to more completed data than self-reported data via telephone or mail surveys. It is possible that the like group of children was observed multiple times during each session, and in fact overall helmet use was lower. This, too, depends on how the researchers define rate of helmet use, because procedure of rides where a helmet is used, and the morsel of riders who use a helmet is a different measure.Another smother with validity is that it was impossible for researchers to track how often individual riders wore their helmets. It is possible that some children invariably wore one, and other children rarely or now and then wore one. A better measure of helmet use would have been to track individual children and to note how frequently they wore their helmets while riding the ir bikes. law of nature enforcement is another issue in this study. all(prenominal) community who adopts a program of this type may require a different kind of enforcement, or none at all.This community allowed parent citations (which were rarely used) and bike impoundment (parents had to go and pick the bike up at the jurisprudence force station, where they turn out helmet ownership or were offered a unthaw helmet, and they were also re-educated on bike gum elastic). other(a) communities may rely more heavily on citations, or they may choose fines. Fines were not a good selection for this community, as it was a rural community where a large minority lived at a lower place the poverty line.Another issue is that the police may be perceived other than in different areas. As the researchers noted, even the knowledge of police presence and enforcement was adequacy for umteen children to wear their helmets. This suggests a value for the police force, which is common in rur al areas. In other areas, especially urban, police may not be regarded so highly, and enforcement may become a larger problem. In an urban area, the sheer number of children would also possibly be prohibitive.This study was fairly reliable. Researchers followed up on the helmet use unofficially after 2 years and came up with similar results, which indicates both that helmet use was continuing and that the study was able to touch the same results. Other studies, if they used the same observation methods, would probably also fulfil similar results. This study is repeatable as written, despite its flaws. A better way to do this study would be to gain two groups of children experimental and control.Both groups would be surveyed and observed for their helmet use at the scratch line of the study, and these numbers would be compared. Then, the experimental group would be given the bicycle safety education and be offered free helmets. The second group would be told they should wear helme ts but not offered extensive bicycle education or given free helmets. The researchers would then track individual riders through observation on at least a weekly basis to see how many in each group wore their helmets on a frequent basis.This would allow researchers to track riders instead of simply rides, and to make sure that each child was only counted once in their statistics. It would also show the tack together of bicycle education and offering free helmets on helmet use. It is apparent in this picky study that children only began to wear their helmets because they were offered free helmets. If they had been asked to go and buy helmets, cost would likely have been prohibitive in a rural, low socio-economic area. Therefore, providing the helmets was a key straits in the plan.It may be evoke to do a study where children are provided with bicycle education and a leaning of resources on where to purchase helmets, but not actually provided with them. This study would best be d one in a suburban area where the socio-economic status was higher, and would show the number of bicycle education and possibly police enforcement on helmet use. Since further studies are possible and required, and since the researchers themselves are aware of the studys limitations, it would be prudent not to take place these results to all communities and situations.The study is ideal for the researchers purposes but has a highly limited scope. Overall, this research is very interesting. Regardless of the studys limitations, introducing bike safety and helmets into the community resulted in statistically significant increases in helmet use, which supposedly resulted in fewer bike-related injuries and deaths. This is a step in the right direction, and although more research and more community programs are needed to both increase helmet use and fall down injuries, this study shows that programs are effective and diversity is possible.